David Tanguay

From The Institute of Stork Research and Science



Posted: Monday, June 25, 2007

by

Two different theories exist concerning the origin of children: the theory of Sexual reproduction, and the theory of the stork. Many people believe in the theory of sexual reproduction because they have been taught this theory at school. In reality, however, many of the world's leading scientists are in favor of the theory of the stork. If the theory of sexual reproduction is taught in schools, it must only be taught as a theory and not as the truth. Alternative theories, such as the theory of the stork, must also be taught.

 

Evidence supporting the theory of the stork includes the following:

1. It is a scientifically established fact that the stork does exist. This can be confirmed by every ornithologist.

2. The alleged human fetal development contains several features that the theory of sexual reproduction is unable to explain.

3. The theory of sexual reproduction implies that a child is approximately nine months old at birth. This is an absurd claim. Everyone knows that a newborn child is newborn.

4. According to the theory of sexual reproduction, children are a result of sexual intercourse. There are, however, several well-documented cases where sexual intercourse has not led to the birth of a child.

5. Statistical studies in the Netherlands have indicated a positive correlation between the birth rate and the number of storks. Both are decreasing.

6. The theory of the stork can be investigated by rigorous scientific methods. The only assumption involved is that children are delivered by the stork. “ Author Unknown

                                                                                



This Article has been viewed 711 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)
» left by Jean Horst
4 years 214 days ago.
177 fans.
David, This article just totally cracked me up! Thanks for the laugh.
Please log in to respond to this comment.
» left by 4 years 214 days ago.
Well you know Jean, I can't remember where I found this. But I took it funny at first also, but I believe the author had his own description of where life really came from. If you read between the lines I think you'll find what was intended.
Please log in to respond to this comment.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.